It’s under selection all over the place: Europe, Ethiopia, and now among the Bushmen. The advantage can’t be more vitamin D, nor is it associated with agriculture. It does have other effects. Next, the haplotype is very long, yet has been around a long time. Shouldn’t be like that. I was talking with Razib Khan about this a while back: could be that there is more than one active site on the haplotype? Epistatic? That you need at least two changes to get the positive effect, whatever it is? So recombined haplotypes that don’t hold both sites are not favored?
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- December 2023
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
Categories
- Aging
- Altitude adaptations
- Amerindians
- Archaic humans
- Ashkenazi Jews
- assortative mating
- Australian Aboriginals
- Book Reviews
- Bushmen
- Cold War
- Denisovans
- Dietary adaptations
- dysgenics
- Economics
- Education
- Eskimo
- European Prehistory
- Evolutionary Medicine
- Genetics
- Genghis -Khan effect
- GGS
- homo erectus
- Homosexuality
- Indo-European
- Linguistics
- Low-hanging Fruit
- Mangani
- Neanderthals
- Pygmies
- Skin color
- Speaking ill of the dead
- sub-Saharan Africans
- Uncategorized
- World War Two
Meta
“The advantage can’t be more vitamin D, nor is it associated with agriculture.”
But the Koreans, North-Chinese and Japanese have different haplogroups causing skin lightening which are similar to Europeans. They are on similar geographical latitudes and have roughly similar neolitizationed diets. There might have been selection elsewhere but no as strong as in Europe: Nobody is as white as Europeans or the aforementioned Asians.
“have different haplogroups causing skin lightening which are similar to Europeans.”
The resulting lightness of skin being similar, not the haplogroups. I must learn to reread responses before hitting the Post button.
The more important thing to note, as I said last year in a similar thread, is that populations which are mixed between East and West Eurasian, like the Uighurs, do not show any evidence of elevated frequency.
This suggests that not only did East Asians have an SNP which provided a parallel method of doing…whatever it does…but also that the selective advantage is not additive – that either SLC24A5 or its East Eurasian analogue alone will do you just fine.
You may need to look at the frequency of the whole haplotype, per Greg’s comments.
Though it’s hard to see how exactly what you suggest would work, exactly. Uighurs are not a population who are uniformly heterozygote for one copy of derived SLC24A5 and one copy of some East Eurasian variant somewhere else.
Another note – Uighurs are probably recently admixed with recent Mongolian ancestry, so may not be much time for selection to operate. May be more interesting to look at ancient Scythians and Siberians and any direct descendant populations who exist – e.g. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14615. All East Scythians have a derived European SNP at SLC24A5, despite East Eurasian ancestry 30-60%. Sample size only 4 sites though.
Another thing that is so interesting is that blond hair, blue eyes and light skin is so tightly connected nowadays, but originated independently. Could that mean that a least in Europe there was sexual preference selection?
no, because that happened in the high latitude tundra-steppe in the late pleistocene 😉 j/k
Absolutely, I see it now. Same adaptation as the snow leopard and snow fox. (kidding back)
Damn.. Turns out you were no kidding at all..
Click to access 164400-2.pdf
“However, for all three well-characterized skin and eye-color associated SNPs, the SHGs display a frequency that is greater for the light-skin variants and the blue-eye variant than can be expected from a mixture of WHGs and EHGs. This observation indicates that the frequencies may have increased due to continued adaptation to a low light conditions.”
SLC24A5 became popular in a lot of places because of migration not selection. In became popular in Europe because of Anatolian migration. Migration might also be able to explain SLC24A5 in India and Ethiopia.
I’m not saying it hasn’t been selected for in many places, I’m just saying migration plays a role.
Well, if there really is epistasis in an old and conserved haplotype, it should be fairly easy to identify where at least two of the putative epistatic sites are: at the ends of the conserved regions.