Peripheral Strategies

Pseudoerasmus had an interesting thought about the Cold War: that all the West’s efforts in the Third World were pointless, had little effect on the ultimate outcome, with the possible exception of some big oil producers. “most developing countries could have disappeared into a black hole 16 galaxies away & it might have made little difference to the outcome.”

Nice to be arguing with someone who’s not crazy, for a change.

He has a point. If you’re thinking about human capital, industrial resources, military potential – those countries didn’t amount to much. Cuba didn’t matter, Angola didn’t matter, Vietnam didn’t matter.

I was recently reading The World was Going Our Way: The KGB and the Battle for the Third World. The Soviets were struggling for influence & trying to screw the US all over the globe, but not much came from it, even when they prevailed: it was like trying to build bricks without straw. What can you do with Afghanistan, with Ethiopia, with South Yemen? Pseudoerasmus says ” serene non-intervention by the USA everywhere (except maybe oil-producing middle east) would have made little difference to the final outcome.”

Look at the correlation of forces, write down the power equation, and he sure looks right.

But he’s not right.

Advertisements
Posted in Uncategorized | 216 Comments

The 100,000 Hour Rule

Come back in 50 years and tell me how it works.

Posted in Uncategorized | 24 Comments

The Last Question

Asking for a friend:

At current prices bitcoin mining is in some places not a paying proposition, depending upon the local cost of electricity. Some computers are thus idle. Anyone know of a project whose likely results are either A. very interesting or B. profitable (or C. both) that could use a couple of million computers?

Posted in Uncategorized | 24 Comments

Plague of Frogs

Starting in late 80s, herpetologists began noticing that various kinds of frogs were declining and/or disappearing. There was & is a geographical pattern: Wiki says “Declines have been particularly intense in the western United States, Central America, South America, eastern Australia and Fiji. ” Many were hard to understand in terms of human impact. “For example, the Golden toad (Bufo periglenes) endemic to Monteverde, Costa Rica, featured prominently. It was the subject of scientific research until populations suddenly crashed in 1987 and it had disappeared completely by 1989.[9] Other species at Monteverde, including the Monteverde Harlequin Frog (Atelopus varius), also disappeared at the same time. Because these species were located in the pristine Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve, and these extinctions could not be related to local human activities. ”

For a few years the herpetologists were concerned yet happy. Concerned, because many frog populations were crashing and some were going extinct. Happy, because confused puppies in Washington were giving them money, something that hardly ever happens to frogmen. The theory was that amphibians were ‘canaries in a coal mine’, uniquely sensitive to environmental degradation.
Possibly frogs were being killed by an increase in UV radiation (from CFCs). Of course you could always put out a fucking ultraviolet photometer and measure the UV anywhere and anytime you wanted, but that would be the easy way out. Why do that when you could be paying graduate students to play with frogs?

In 1993, people discovered an odd fungus [ Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis] infecting frogs in Queensland. Since then it has been linked to many dramatic population declines in “western North America, Central America, South America, eastern Australia, East Africa (Tanzania) and Dominica and Montserrat.” Some species it bops, others it exterminates. Frog species with few offspring and high parental investment, such as mouth-breeding frogs, seem particularly vulnerable. It works like an STD, which can propagate when population density is low. Frogs congregate in ponds to mate, which allows transmission, as long as the frogs mate at all.

It took some time for herpetologists to admit that this chytrid fungus is the main culprit – some are still resisting. First, it was a lot like how doctors resisted Semmelweiss’ discoveries about the cause of puerperal fever – since doctors were the main method of transmission. How did this fungus get to the cloud forests of Costa Rica? On the boots of herpetologists, of course.

The second problem is Occam’s butterknife: even though this chytrid fungus is the main culprit, it’s just got to be more complicated than that. Even if it isn’t. People in the life sciences – biology and medicine – routinely reject simple hypotheses that do a good job of explaining the data for more complex hypotheses that don’t. College taught them to think – unwisely.

It looks if it infected the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis) for a long time, well before the current epidemic, and was spread by worldwide use of that frog in human pregnancy testing.

Look at the broad pattern of areas affected: the Americas, Australia, islands. Amphibians in those areas were profoundly isolated from the Old World, just as their human inhabitants were. North America is not isolated when it comes to birds or mammals – there has often been an exchange of species thru Beringia, during glacial periods – but amphibians can’t survive salt water or glaciers. They’ve been isolated from Old World amphibians for a long long time – more than 100 million years, looks like. And since the Old World is bigger, with more intense biological competition*, invasive biological trouble is more likely to originate there than in the Americas or Australia.

People are still talking about environmental factors. Used to be UV (wasn’t true), herbicides ( also untrue – kind of silly way out in the jungle). Now, of course, it has to be climate change .

* if you can make it there, you can make it anywhere!

Posted in Uncategorized | 39 Comments

Private conversations

What’s the right thing to do when someone has, in private conversation, admitted that he doesn’t believe in his public position?

Posted in Uncategorized | 110 Comments

The hijab of ignorance

If you didn’t know which position you’d be born into in society, you would choose, not egalitarianism, but a form of society that maximized the rate of technological progress. That would increases your chance of living in a world with penicillin, Mozart, and pizza – all far more important than social position. Since you don’t know when you’re going to be born, either.

Better bullshitâ„¢ than Rawls.

Posted in Uncategorized | 102 Comments

Podcast on education

Our podcast on Bryan Caplan’s new book is now ready. You’ll find it here.

Posted in Uncategorized | 20 Comments