Someone should develop a course based entirely on the Flashman novels.
- December 2022
- September 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- Altitude adaptations
- Archaic humans
- Ashkenazi Jews
- assortative mating
- Australian Aboriginals
- Book Reviews
- Cold War
- Dietary adaptations
- European Prehistory
- Evolutionary Medicine
- Genghis -Khan effect
- homo erectus
- Low-hanging Fruit
- Skin color
- Speaking ill of the dead
- sub-Saharan Africans
- World War Two
Yes, they really should.
This would be a great way to teach history, creative writing, psychology and many other subjects. But it would never pass muster with our PC overseers. Any professor that dared to teach such a course would be assaulted, professionally defamed and forced to retire.
Harry Flashman, HERO OF THE (British) IMPERIUM?
Ah. A fellow warhammerite?
As a guilty pleasure I’ve enjoyed the adventures of Ciaphas Cain, said to be inspired by the exemplary Flashman. Time to get into the original
There’s something about the 40k universe, demons in space, fanatical human Imperium, that is unique and appealing, and indeed, it took the sacrifice of the God Emperor for me to begin to understand what it is that moves people when they speak of Jesus “dying for our sins”, and I grew up in a Christian household
True. For all its juvenile, nerdish insanity (and prices, cannot forget the prices) Warhammer 40k is one of the few “rightist”/conservative entertainment franchises left in our culture.
Ah, Flashman! Perhaps time for a reread….
It would definitely be fun until it got shut down. The Flashman novels make learning the history of the Victorian era pretty painless…except for those who take offense at everything.
Add Patrick O’Brien too!
You can learn a lot from reading Patrick O’Brien. In addition to all those Patrick O’Brien novels there are also supplementary works such as a lexicon and an atlas to help the reader puzzle out the details.
Yeah, I own three of those supplements, including the cookbook (which I recommend).
I could never get into the O’Brien novels and read Hornblower years ago. Those are quite good.
O’Brien’s are better. Best.
I thought the first volume had been, in all seriousness, reviewed by American historians as a valuable contribution to our understanding of British India?
Fraser’s The Hollywood History of the World is pretty good.
I’ve loved Flashy since my scurrilous lawyer uncles lent me the first volume over 25 years ago. One of these uncles spent age 7 – 17 in a British boarding school where he became so good at getting away with mischief that being a Para in N. Ireland during the Troubles and then a London stockbroker weren’t enough to tax his skills, so he eventually had to become a US Federal prosecutor. His father, high in British intel. in the Far East, was also a great Flashman aficionado.
Beyond the engrossing historical detail, Flashy teaches boys how to think and act like the men that built the Empire.
Your uncle fits the profile of the characters in Stalky & Company, Kipling’s very fun novel on breaking the rules in an English boarding school. Kipling seems to have thought that the rule-breakers, not the rule-followers, were the creators of Empire.
Sort of. I think the actual point of those stories was to valorize that kind of rule-breaking energy (“spirit” was a word the Victorians used) when coupled with adult self discipline in the service of the Empire.
I don’t. I think that Fraser was trying to have fun and make money.
gcochran: I was referring to the “Stalky & Co” stories, not Flashman,
He did enough serious history to be excused for doing some good, fun historical ficion
Thanks for the recommendation, I’ll try to find a copy. Of course Flashman was originally a bully at Rugby School in Tom Brown’s School Days (1857).
Which he says up front in the first book!
“Beyond the engrossing historical detail, Flashy teaches boys how to think and act like the men that built the Empire.”
Like cowards, bounders and cads?
(I’ve only read the first book, which admittedly was great fun.)
“Scurrilous” was the wrong word. The one uncle I mentioned is a bit “scoundrelous”, the other has been described as “squirrelly”, I somehow came up with “scurrilous” as halfway between the two.
They’re great books, although Flashman’s ability to learn new languages gets a bit unbelievable at a certain point.
Not to me. There is a small minority of adult humans that retains a child-like ability to absorb languages on contact. I have that trait in what I believe to be a relatively weak form, because I know of people who have it much more strongly and eat new languages like candy as a form of recreation. I myself merely pick them up spontaneously at a relatively fast rate when landed somewhere that I need to.
I’ve done a little digging into the literature on language learning and appears a lot of us natural polyglots have histories as crib bilinguals (English and Spanish in my case). There is some scattered but suggested evidence that our organs of Broca are organized unusually.
(An easy test for this polyglot trait is whether a person has Frodo ear, that is can easily and accurately reproduce phonemes that are not in a language the person actually speaks. No natural polyglot lacks this ability, but it is rare in monoglots.)
Flashy, as presented, is a very strong and correspondingly rare sort of polyglot, but not out of the range that I believe occurs in reality.
I should also note a fact well known to polyglots: it gets easier as you go. That is, unless you’re jumping well outside the language families you have prior familiarity with, language N+1 is easier than language N.
Even a weak polyglot such as myself gets very good at finding a similarity that can be used as as a toehold. On my first exposure to Polish spoken in Poland, the percentage of Latin roots in the vocabulary (high relative to other Slavic languages) really stood out of the background. It helped.
Wasn’t Flashy partly based on Burton? That’s what I always heard. Burton could speak–with varying levels of fluency–over 40 languages.
reminds me, i was never impressed by videos of people speaking memorized phases of many different languages
The first book backs you up. Harry Paget Flashman does seem to have this trait.
My only thought was the speed. Is two weeks a reasonable time to learn a new language to a conversational level?
I think there’s even more dramatic examples of language learning in the later books, but I can’t find them.
Almost, if you are the right kind of person.
I’ve heard of people who can learn a new language in a week. A rather rate ability, but doable.
I wouldn’t say I could learn language in a week, but it is not unlikely that, if the vocabulary had a reasonable number of cognates with a language I already know, I could get to understanding and generating simple sentences in that time.
And my accent would already be pretty good – I pick up phonology and prosody faster than grammar.
I believe this is typical performance for a weak polyglot. I’ve only spoken four languages.
interesting. i too have some facility with languages, though its exercise has lain dormant, and i started with learning English and Mandarin at the same time
i noticed that Hawaiian was extraordinarily difficult at first
want to parlay this into some kind of money and adventures
There is the well-documented case of Cardinal Giuseppe Mezzofanti (1774-1849) who spoke at least 30 languages.
my wife’s like that – picks up languages in no time
George Borrow https://tinyurl.com/y7e64u9t It’s plain from The Bible in Spain https://tinyurl.com/y994tzbj that EITHER he was a remarkably gifted linguist OR he had a very fertile literary imagination. (Though Borrow later confessed to the London Bible Society that Manchu had given him more trouble than he’d let on.)
Some people are language-learning freaks.
Yeah, those hyperpolyglots are a class above me.
Still, I think I have more in common with them than I do with monoglots, clear down to the neurology.
Facility with languages seems to be SOP in certain kinds of books. For example, even Robert E Howard’s Conan had no trouble picking-up the most wildly divergent tongues.
Conan and other REH heroes, along with ERB’s heroes as well. In the case of REH, most of his protagonists are of some sort of Celtic extraction. Rightly or wrongly, Celts have had a reputation for easily learning new languages. That idea was certainly current during Howard’s era. Conaqn could not only speak 20+ languages, he could read numerous scripts, including Archaic Stygian.
REH was a big fan of Richard Burton.
“Remembering something, the Cimmerian drew forth the roll of parchment he had taken from the mummy and unrolled it carefully, as it seemed ready to fall to pieces with age. He scowled over the dim characters with which it was covered. In his roaming about the world the giant adventurer had picked up a wide smattering of knowledge, particularly including the speaking and reading of many alien tongues. Many a sheltered scholar would have been astonished at the Cimmerian’s linguistic abilities, for he had experienced many adventures where knowledge of a strange language had meant the difference between life and death.”
Robert E Howard, JEWELS OF GWAHLUR
Actually, a Penn professor in the history department includes them in his curriculum. He is part of the old guard, and when he is gone the school will not see his like again.
A lead-in course could be based on O’Brian’s Aubrey-Martin series of 20 novels from 1800-1815.
Any other good historical novels while we are at it? I’d nominate “Prince of Foxes”, “I, Claudius”, and probably Hornblower.
I wanted to beg for other recommendations. I got into the “First Man of Rome” series a few years ago. And the dude that writes about Saxon/pre-England … cornwell?
Oh, huh, he wrote the Sharpe books. Didn’t read them, but watched much of the series a few years ago. Sean Bean is a great actor. Game of Thrones died along with his character.
Clavell’s Shogun, TaiPan and King Rat are spectacular. His others not so much….
The three mentioned cover Sengoku Japan and Tokugawas rise, 19th century Hong Kong, and WW2 prison camps in Singapore (loosely autobiographical, Clavell was held at Changi).
Noble House was quite good too. That one inspired a friend to move to Hong Kong and he hasn’t come back yet.
Historical novels are too broad to really recommend anything blind, but I always liked Stephen Lawhead’s Byzantium, which is about the Book of Kells and many other subjects besides. The research is amazing – he even gets little details right, like how the 9th century Irish monks have monasteries without glass windows, because glass was highly-valued plunder for Viking raiders.
Lots of people like Connor Iggulden’s Wolf of the Plains series. To me, they feel cold and mechanical, like someone picked “Mongols” in Age of Empires II and wrote down all the details of their game.
John Derbyshire’s Fire from the Sun is supposed to be very good re: Chinese history.
Anyone knows historical novels worth reading about Aztecs and Mayas (conquest or preconquest)?
Gary Jennings wrote some conquest and post-conquest historical novels about Mexico. His first is appropriately names Aztec.
I will give it a try.
Samuel Shellabarger who wrote “Prince of Foxes” (in the backdrop of the Borges in Italy), which I recommended above, also wrote a book called “Captain from Castile.” The Aztecs feature prominently. A tad melodramatic in one or two places, but still a pretty good adventure book. Some say his best. Both books were made into movies in the ’40s, so you can see how they were pretty popular.
I’ve only seen one of the movies, “Prince of Foxes.” It is not exactly bad, but the book is much superior.
It turns out there is not a lot of novels about precolumbian America. But there are almost no movies about this era (Apocalypto). Serious oversight.
The Death of the Fifth Sun by Robert Somerlott is good, although out of print. It’s the Spanish conquest from Malinche’s perspective.
But you don’t have to read fiction: the real historical documents are great reading. Here’s The Memoirs of the Conquistador Bernal Diaz Del Castillo in English. It covers all sorts of stuff – adventures, battles, sieges, his efforts at getting paid for his labours. He gets pretty sarcastic at point, and Hernando Cortez’s deputy Pedro de Alvarado comes across as a Harry Flashman type of guy.
The Conquest of New Spain would make a hell of a movie.
It would be interesting to see what someone like Ridley Scott could do – with a decent enough budget – directing something based on The Conquest of New Spain. His film “1492: Conquest of Paradise”, while critically / commercially panned and mostly forgotten, is beautifully shot and scored. Even if not historically accurate, there are few things as funny as Gerard Depardieu playing Christopher Columbus with a heavy French accent.
A gripping tale, and thank you for the link; now, hate to be that guy, but whenever our bold author mentions the Spanish armament of guns, crossbows, and their swords, I can’t help but think how badly they would fare against Eurasian armies
The date is 1519; guns of a hundred years later could not defeat Mongols and Manchus; guns which were patterned on Japanese guns, said to be the most advanced in the world at the time. In this respect guns were even inferior to the Chinese crossbows of old, of the Han dynasty, certainly the Song, and even early Ming dynasty crossbows *
And their crossbows: the pre-Ming Chinese crossbow was superior to the medieval European on account of the nature of its trigger mechanism and power stroke. European crossbows were equivalent to bows, and were wrecked by the superior fire rate of longbows for their trouble, but the old Chinese crossbows were consistently relied on to outdistance and to out armor pierce even composite bows. With a countermarch drill the Song were able to completely destroy non cataphract cavalry and nullify any prospect of close combat purely on crossbow missile power alone, a fact that lulled them into false security
Our adventurers’ swords which they very much relied on to turn the tide in melee were described, albeit some think ambiguously, by the Ming Chinese as ‘soft’, and their consequent melee ability lacking. And there is reason to believe that, as with crossbow technology, Chinese metallurgy had declined from former days; certainly in quality control and maintenance. Overwrought though the legend of the katana may be, the Chinese preferred Japanese to European blades
In fairness the armament of the European sailor in the far east may be different from that of a conquistador expedition; certainly the military elite had access to better swords. However, the Dutch assessed late Ming armor as essentially bullet proof
And late Ming sources state that Mongol and Manchu forces had even better armor compared to the Ming; indeed, the bulletproofness first is said of the Manchu forces. However, the late Ming remnants that the Dutch fought may have improved out of necessity; previously, when the Ming still had a country in the north, Ming armors were lamented to be neglected and leaky ‘as a sieve’
To bring this late night ramble to a close, the Spanish brought artillery – though the late Ming were actually no slouches on this point – and so it is with cannons that the Spanish must stake their lives, if they fought against the northern hordes
“With a countermarch drill the Song were able to completely destroy non cataphract cavalry and nullify any prospect of close combat purely on crossbow missile power alone”
Something that would not be replicated by guns until the latter 19th century
“And late Ming sources state that Mongol and Manchu forces had even better armor compared to the Ming”
A far cry from the Han dynasty’s mockery of the dull and simple equipment of the barbarians. “Palm of excellence” indeed
“Our adventurers’ swords”
Almost useless against cavalry. Hypothetical conquistadors would do well to prefigure the future and bring some pikes. Indeed, Chinese commanders threatened to use pikes if the Europeans ever landed in force on dry land, the Spanish in the Philippines observed Chinese pirates using pikes and began to use them as well, Chinese pirates were themselves repelled off a European ship by pikes and cannons.
Though pikes are actually not all that useful against cataphracts and horse archers. Unless they have quite a lot of cannons, composite bows (proper crossbow technology unlikely to be replicated), and horse slaughtering blades, it will be time to get reamed
Biggins’ Otto Prohaska novels https://tinyurl.com/yaj4ahu9
Oh, yeah. Those are damned good!
I devoured Michener’s stuff as a teen: CHESAPEAKE, HAWAII,CENTENNIAL, SPACE, etc. The writing’s mediocre and the characters are pure cardboard, but the historical value is quite high. Plus, he plays fair with the reader, letting you know when he’s deviating from straight fact.
Gore Vidal’s work is of higher literary value and quite enjoyable, especially if you like a good dollop of acid in your fiction.Of his oeuvre , my favorites are BURR and CREATION.
I liked “Count Belisarius” (same guy as I Claudius)
I am surprised no one here has mentioned Cadfael – a 12th century Welsh monk in Shresbury who solves crimes – by Edith Pargeter writing as Ellis Peters. The 20 novels each have a theme – a yearly fair, the pilgrim business, marriages, city life, monastery life. A series was also filmed with Derek Jacobi as Cadfael and all 20 novels have been adapted.
Not only is the series interesting and accessible, it also has very beautiful prose.
“Eaters of the Dead,” by Michael Chrichton, is great. The novel is framed as a historic document written by an envoy from the Baghdad caliphate who gets abducted by Vikings and travels with them. There are many fascinating details about Viking life.
“The 13th Shithead” — my buddy (RIP)
A fun adventure novel, but there are plenty of inaccuracies–starting with Neanderthals. Crichton’s conceit that the events somehow “inspired” BEOWULF is chronologically ridiculous. If schoolkids need to learn about Vikings, then Bengtssen’s THE LONG SHIPS, Haggard’s ERIC BRIGHTEYES or any of several Poul Anderson novels would be far, far better.
Anderson’s THE BROKEN SWORD is outstanding.
I kept waiting for an old sergeant to say ” Come on, you elves! Do you want to live forever?”
Totally forgot that Frank Frazetta did some of the Flashman covers:
Yep, I own that one. FLASH AT THE CHARGE has a Frazetta cover as well.
You know that most of the students would have no idea they were learning fiction. Let’s include Clan of the Cave Bear, (translated through cave paintings), Shogun, and by all means the Seven Samurai.
I read a newspaper interview with MacDonald Fraser in which he said that he had plotted out “the Lincoln book” about Flashman in the American Civil War. “All I have to do now is write it” – but the next news of him I saw was that he had died leaving no unpublished work behind. What a shame.
‘Wolf Hall’ and ‘Bring Up The Bodies’ by Hilary Mantel, excellent.
Seconded. Brill, triff, and treemendous.
One of the few books I’ve actually thrown across the room after the first chapter. Awful stuff. I get that she doesn’t like Papists, but really, does she have to let us all know in such tendentious fashion?
She was brought up as a Papist.
Leaving every volume of the Flashman series lying around the house was exactly how I went about sneaking 19th century history into my kids’ brains. Worked, too.
Do people still read the Hornblower stories? I was keen on them when I was young.
An excellent suggestion.
By the way, for those who may not have read, or been aware of, GMF’s memoir, “Quartered Safe Out Here”, it is very much worth seeking out. MacDonald Fraser was an infantryman in the
Border Regiment and fought in the Burma campaign of 44/45. The eminent historian John Keegan considered it “one of the great personal memoirs of WW II”.
I enjoyed the Wolf of the Steppes stories by Harold Lamb. Probably an influence on Robert E. Howard.
Lamb was absolutely an influence on REH. Howard even wrote a (now lost) long poem featuring Lamb’s Cossack duo, Ayub and Demid. There were certainly other major influences on Howard, but Lamb was definitely one of them.
So my high school actually did have a class like this, though it was American history, and the books weren’t as !PC as Flashman. We read “Huck Finn”, “Little Big Man”, which had far more sex than I’ expected at a Catholic high shcool; watched “Gone With The Wind”, and read several other novels I’ve forgotten (though not “The Scarlet Letter”).